靠逼视频,日韩三级中文字幕91,很狠狠很久久久久久久之,1级蜜臀av

How to Choose MWCO Filters?

2024.04.10 11125


MWCO filters, also known as centrifugal filters, are commonly used lab ultrafiltration devices for the concentration, purification and buffer exchange of polynucleotides and protein samples. To select the appropriate ultrafiltration MWCO filters, we need to consider many factors, like the molecular weight(MW) and molecules composition of the sample, concentration, transmembrane pressure,etc.


But we generally recommend choosing an ultrafiltration membrane with a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) that is 2-3 times smaller than the molecular weight of the target macromolecule that wants to be concentrated. Learn more about how to use centrifugal filters step by step by reading our blog.


Table of Contents

  1. Molecular Weight (MW)
    1. kDa vs Microns
  2. MWCO in Ultrafiltration
    1. Impact of Small MWCO Filters
    2. Impact of Large MWCO Filters
  3. Impacts Affect Interception in Ultrafiltration
    1. Sample concentration
    2. Molecules composition
    3. Transmembrane pressure
    4. Chemical compatibility
    5. pH and ionic conditions
    6. Temperature
  4. Conclusion


Molecular Weight (MW)

In microfiltration, the pore size of the membrane is usually measured in microns(range from 0.1 to 10μm), indicating that particles larger than this specification will be retained by the membrane.


For ultrafiltration membranes(range from 0.01 to 0.1μm ), they are categorized based on NMWL (Nominal Molecular Weight Limit) or MWCO (Molecular Weight Cut Off), which are in the unit of Daltons(Da) or KiloDalton (kDa). 1 kilodalton equals 1000 daltons.


kDa vs Microns

KiloDaltons(kDa) is a unit of measurement for molecular weight. An increase in the kDa of a molecule indicates a corresponding increase in the number of atoms within the molecule. On the other hand, a micrometer (micron or μm) is a measure of molecular length.


Although molecular weight and molecular length are related, there isn't a specific, fixed constant of proportionality between weight and length. This relationship varies due to multiple factors, including the protein's structure, compactness, and conformation in a solution. This means, an increase of atoms, which leads to an increase in kDa value, may still keep the same molecular diameter.


As a general guideline, 100 kDa typically corresponds to a particle radius of 10 nm (equals to 0.01 μm).


For a more precise assessment of a protein's size, techniques like dynamic light scattering (DLS) or size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) can be utilized as they directly measure the size distribution.


MWCO in Ultrafiltration

Molecular Weight Cut-Off (MWCO) is a term used in membrane filtration to describe the pore size or rejection capacity of an ultrafiltration membrane. An ultrafiltration membrane with defined MWCO indicates that 90% of the molecules above this value will be retained by the membrane. Ultrafiltration membrane manufacturers commonly produce MWCO's of 3kDa, 10kDa, 30kDa, 50kDa, 100kDa etc.

---wikipedia


However, various factors affect retention capabilities in ultrafiltration, we generally recommend choosing an ultrafiltration membrane with a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) that is 2-3 times smaller than the molecular weight of the target macromolecule that wants to be concentrated. This choice ensures better results and the efficiency of the ultrafiltration process.


Filter MWCO Target MW
3 kDa 6 kDa < MW < 30 kDa
10 kDa 30 kDa < MW < 100 kDa
30 kDa 100 kDa < MW < 200 kDa
50 kDa200 kDa < MW <500 kDa
100 kDa MW > 500 kDa

Diagram: MWCO and Target MW


Want to learn how to calculate a DNA, RNA or Protein’s molecular weight(MW), Read this article: How to select the correct MWCO for DNA, RNA and protein purification and concentration.


Impact of Small MWCO Filters

Selecting an MWCO membrane that is too small may prolong the concentration process and reduce the flow rate. Additionally, a smaller MWCO filter might lead to protein precipitation due to the high protein concentration. Both excessively rapid or excessive concentrations can contribute to protein precipitation.


Impact of Large MWCO Filters

Conversely, opting for an MWCO that is too large will result in the membrane's surface intercepting more macromolecules and particles in the sample, leading to increased non-specific binding. To maximize yield, it is recommended to use a relatively smaller filter unit and membrane area. Cobetter Briscale centrifugal filters are made of low protein binding Regenerated Cellulose membranes, which featured a relatively high protein recovery rate. 


Impacts Affect Interception in Ultrafiltration

As mentioned above, various factors affect membrane retention capabilities and product recovery in ultrafiltration, including molecular conformations, charged properties, sample concentration and composition, operating conditions, and equipment configuration, etc. Here are some factors to take into consideration:


Sample concentration

Samples with concentrations below 1mg/mL will pass through more easily compared to those exceeding 10mg/mL. Furthermore, the presence of other molecules can increase sample concentrations as well.


Molecules composition

Globular proteins have higher rejection than flexible polymers with extended chains, such as polystyrene and dextran. This implies that linear molecules are more easily to pass through membrane pores compared to globular molecules.


Therefore, for approximately globular molecules, it is best to choose a centrifugal filter with MWCO equal to or slightly smaller than the molecular weight of the target molecule. This will shorten the centrifugation time, ensure the recovery rate simultaneously, and significantly reduce the risk of macromolecular damage.


Transmembrane pressure

High transmembrane pressure caused by G-force during the centrifugal process will increase molecule passage. On the contrary, reducing the g-force can enhance the membrane’s molecule retention capabilities.


Chemical compatibility

To prevent swelling or degradation that could impair membrane performance, it's essential for membranes to be chemically compatible with the feed solution.


pH and ionic conditions

pH change and ionic condition change may cause molecule conformational changes or aggregation.


Temperature

Lower temperatures can reduce molecule permeation through a membrane when compared to high-temperature conditions (4oC versus 24oC).


Conclusion

By carefully considering the MWCO of the ultrafiltration membrane, you can achieve optimal concentration, reduce protein precipitation, and enhance overall efficiency in your filtration process. When working with samples lacking a reference, it is recommended to initially test a centrifugal filter with a Molecular Weight Cut-Off (MWCO) that is 1/2 the molecular weight of your target molecule.


As so many factors affect the final result, it is crucial to conduct pilot experiments to validate membrane performance for a specific application. Cobetter Briscale? centrifugal filter units offer reliable performance and high protein recovery, making them an excellent choice for your ultrafiltration needs.


You may also be interested in

丰满熟女黄色| 九九性感一级片| 九九九999久久久| 美女18禁裸体私密部位无遮挡网站| 尤物人人操人人干| 偷拍自拍亚洲区| 国产日B视频网站| 91香蕉伊人综合久久| 日韩成人搞大还视频网站| 亚洲精品网站3D动漫之医院| 麻豆综合久久久久| 抽搐喷水在线| 91精品久久久久久久久无码人妻| 人妖精品人妻一区二区| 美女肏逼视频导航| 日韩中文字码无砖91视频| 久久国产精品污污| 午夜精品电影电影一二三久久久久| 色哟哟无码| 久久国产日韩欧美视频| 无码大黑鸡巴| 国产高超久久久| 欧美日韩国产草草草| 福利吃瓜视频网站| 你想看欧美黄片| 五月激情基地在线| 艹逼视频五码| url 91av.com/| 无码尤物| 国产精品熱女| av之家在线中文日韩有码| 不卡一二三视频| 精品国产十十十区| 久久久久草美女视频麻豆| 夜夜性天天性人人性| 青州市| 91亚洲经典一区二区| 站长欧美日韩一级在线不卡| 欧美日韩性生活视频免费| 成人网站91在线| 久久综合一本加勒比色丨久久精品无|